© 2025. The Trustees of Indiana University
Copyright Complaints
1229 East Seventh Street, Bloomington, Indiana 47405
News, Arts and Culture from WFIU Public Radio and WTIU Public Television
Play Live Radio
Next Up:
0:00
0:00
0:00 0:00
Available On Air Stations
Some web content from Indiana Public Media is unavailable during our transition to a new web publishing platform. We apologize for the inconvenience.

Our Terre Haute 95.1 FM signal is temporarily off the air while we address a technical issue with the FAA. Thanks for your patience — you can still listen anytime at wfiu.org.

Monsanto Settles Agent Orange Lawsuit For $93 Million

The Wars At Home

The residents of Nitro, West Virginia, may not breathe any easier than they did two weeks ago, but hopefully they feel better after receiving a $93 million settlement from agribusiness giant Monsanto.

The plaintiffs of the class-action lawsuit argued that Monsanto had polluted their community by burning waste from the production of Agent Orange, the defoliant famously used as part of the United States' chemical warfare program during the Vietnam War.

Toxic Dioxin

The production of Agent Orange creates dioxin as a chemical byproduct.

Dioxin has been linked to "cancer, birth defects, learning disabilities, endrometriosis, infertility, and suppressed immune functions," says Businessweek.

Long History Of Lawsuits

Litigation regarding Agent Orange production began with seven former employees who sued Monsanto in the 1980s.

One man developed bladder cancer during the trial.

The jury found in the plaintiffs' favor and awarded them moderate damages.

In 2008, individual lawsuits involving current and former residents of Nitro were consolidated into a single class-action suit.

The chemical plant in Nitro closed down in 2004.

"All Or Nothing" Approval

The $93 million settlement includes a budget of $84 million for healthcare monitoring and $9 million to clean up 4,500 homes, in addition to the payment of plaintiffs' legal fees.

Putnam County Circuit Judge Derek Swope, who approved the settlement, dismissed claims from some class members who asserted the settlement wasn't fair.

"Any objection that asserts that the settlements could have been better must be rejected because the question is not whether the actual settlements could have been better, but whether the actual settlements are fair, adequate, and reasonable," Swope wrote, as reprinted by BusinessWeek.

Read More:

  • Monsanto $93 Million Settlement With West Virginia Residents Approved (Insurance Journal)
  • Monsanto Settlement With W. Va. Residents Approved (Bloomberg Businessweek)