© 2025. The Trustees of Indiana University
Copyright Complaints
1229 East Seventh Street, Bloomington, Indiana 47405
News, Arts and Culture from WFIU Public Radio and WTIU Public Television
Play Live Radio
Next Up:
0:00
0:00
0:00 0:00
Available On Air Stations
The Magic Is Ours to Keep. Support Public Media Today
Some web content from Indiana Public Media is unavailable during our transition to a new web publishing platform. We apologize for the inconvenience.

Bill aims to prevent reliability issues when coal plants close early

The former R. Gallagher Station, now retired, seen from Shawnee Park in Louisville, Kentucky in 1988. Duke Energy retired the plant more than a year earlier than it expected.
The former R. Gallagher Station, now retired, seen from Shawnee Park in Louisville, Kentucky in 1988. Duke Energy retired the plant more than a year earlier than it expected.

A state Senate bill aims to ensure Indiana doesn’t transition away from coal “too quickly” and threaten reliability.

If an electric utility wants to retire a big power plant or shut it down early — and it hasn’t laid that out in its plans — it would have to notify the Indiana Utility Regulatory Commission. The agency could then decide not to allow the utility to pay down the remaining cost of the plant in that shorter time frame — which would protect customers from a big rate hike.

Senate Bill 9’s author, Sen. Jean Leising (R-Oldenburg), said she understands the need to retire coal plants when they’ve lived out their useful life.

“To close early just to be — maybe more carbon friendly when your plant has another five or 10 years, that’s probably what I’m trying to get at," she said.

But that’s not the main thing driving utilities away from coal. That would be  cheap renewables and natural gas and the high cost of maintaining older coal plants. And whether Indiana is making that transition too quickly is up for debate. The state ranked  third for most coal use in the country in 2021.

Many of the groups that testified on the bill in committee were neutral, but had some concerns with the language. The Indiana Energy Association said that the IURC already has ways to make sure utilities will provide reliable energy to customers.

Join the conversation and sign up for the Indiana Two-Way. Text "Indiana" to 73224. Your comments and questions in response to our weekly text help us find the answers you need on statewide issues throughout the legislative session. And follow along  with our bill tracker.

The Indiana Industrial Energy Consumers (INDIEC) spoke in opposition. INDIEC's Joe Rompala said he worries the bill could ultimately cost customers more if it keeps utilities from retiring expensive coal plants.

Just like a  law passed in 2020, he said INDIEC sees this bill as a way, “to disregard economic signals or to put a thumb on the scale on one particular resource or another and delay the transition."

The Citizens Action Coalition said it likes that the bill would hold utilities to their plans, but would prefer the IURC had the ability to accept or reject utilities’ long-term plans in the first place.

Coal trade groups America's Power and Reliable Energy Inc. testified in favor.

The bill now goes to the full Senate.

Rebecca is our energy and environment reporter. Contact her at  rthiele@iu.edu or follow her on Twitter at  @beckythiele.

Rebecca Thiele covers statewide environment and energy issues. Before coming to Bloomington, she worked for WMUK Radio in Kalamazoo, Michigan on the arts and environment beats. Thiele was born in St. Louis and is a proud graduate of the University of Missouri School of Journalism.