© 2025. The Trustees of Indiana University
Copyright Complaints
1229 East Seventh Street, Bloomington, Indiana 47405
News, Arts and Culture from WFIU Public Radio and WTIU Public Television
Play Live Radio
Next Up:
0:00
0:00
0:00 0:00
Available On Air Stations
Some web content from Indiana Public Media is unavailable during our transition to a new web publishing platform. We apologize for the inconvenience.

House GOP rejects amendments to halt forcibly de-transitioning transgender youth

House Republicans voted down every amendment.
House Republicans voted down every amendment.

House Republicans rejected an amendment to protect transgender youth from being forcibly de-transitioned by the state. The bill to ban medicinal and surgical gender-affirming care for transgender youth includes a six-month deadline to halt puberty blockers and hormone therapy treatments.

During earlier testimony on  Senate Bill 480, several transgender adolescents, young adults and their parents said if the measure was passed, they would have to leave the state.

Rep. Robin Shackleford (D-Indianapolis) authored a handful of amendments, including  one that would allow transgender youth who are already receiving hormone therapies and puberty blockers to continue to receive that care.

“They’re thriving in school, they’re thriving in work, they’re able to relate to other members in their peer group,” Shackleford said.

Gender-affirming care is health care that encompasses mental, social, medical and surgical care designed to treat gender dysphoria. There is  national and international guidance on age-appropriate treatment.

Rep. Joanna King (R-Middlebury), one of the bill’s House sponsors, called the treatments “unproven” and “harmful” because they lack Food and Drug Administration approval. The pharmaceutical companies who produce the drugs  have not requested FDA approval for gender-affirming care, though the treatments are approved for other uses. Doctors said the  side effects are similar to other kinds of medications, and providers in Indiana said there are mechanisms already in place to make sure side effects are treated efficiently.

READ MORE: What is gender-affirming care?

Join the conversation and sign up for the Indiana Two-Way. Text "Indiana" to 73224. Your comments and questions in response to our weekly text help us find the answers you need on statewide issues throughout the legislative session. And follow along  with our bill tracker.

Shackleford authored three other amendments: one to  remove the ban on medicinal care; one also removing the ban, but adding a  sign-off from parents and medical professionals; and one to create a civil cause of action  for children harmed by the ban.

Rep. Renee Pack (D-Indianapolis) said during discussion on one of the amendments that the legislature is hypocritical in its position on parental rights.

“There’s times where we want parents  to have their say. We want  parents’ thoughts to be considered. And then there’s times we want to say, ‘listen to us,’” Pack said.

After three amendments had already been voted down, Rep. Ed DeLaney (D-Indianapolis) asked the chamber if Shackleford was the only person who cared about transgender issues, calling the silence “deafening.”

“We are arrogating to ourselves medical decisions. We are taking those decisions away from doctors and parents,” DeLaney said.

House Republicans voted down every amendment.

Lauren is our digital editor. Contact her at  lchapman@wfyi.org or follow her on Twitter at  @laurenechapman_.

Lauren Chapman is the digital producer for our statewide collaboration, and is based at WFYI in Indianapolis. She previous has worked at a basketball magazine, a top 30 newspaper, and a commercial television station. Lauren is new to public media, but in addition to her job "making stuff on the internet," she is also a radio and television reporter. She's a proud Ball State University alumna and grew up on the west side of Indianapolis.