There were two bills this session addressing the role of pharmacists in curbing meth production, and the House has now chosen between the two. Both would have put restrictions on pseudoephedrine purchases; lawmakers Monday chose the bill that places slightly less responsibility on the pharmacists.
If you're a patient-of-record at your pharmacy, Rep. Ben Smaltz's, R-Auburn, bill allows you to continue buying pseudoephedrine, a standard cold medicine, as usual. If you're not, you can buy a small amount of the drug before needing a prescription. That's the bill a House committee voted to advance, with one small addition: Smaltz says not just pharmacists, but pharmacy technicians can also handle those sales.
"Pharmacists are busy. It's so easy for a tech, they're standing there right there anyway, it just works out better. Logistically, it's an easier transaction," says Smaltz.
The committee opted for Smaltz's bill over a Senate bill authored by Randy Head, R- Logansport.
Head's required pharmacists to question anyone who wanted to buy pseudoephedrine, to see whether the customer wanted it for a valid reason.
Head, who worked with Smaltz on the issue, says he prefers the direction chosen by the committee.
"Where in my bill, I think pharmacists were afraid that they would be blamed by somebody who wanted Sudafed – ‘Hey, you're making a bad decision' – and that would anger somebody," says Head.
The bill now heads to the House floor.